All Issue

2026 Vol.31, Issue 2

Article

Relationship between Tropical Tuna Catches, Acoustic-based Prey Distribution, and Oceanographic Environments in the Western Indian Ocean

서부 인도양 열대 다랑어 어획량과 음향자료 기반 먹이생물 분포 및 해양환경 간의 관계

정지훈1, Fredrich Simanungkalit1, 강동하1,2, Naizheng Yan3, 김주향4, 송소망4, 김예슬5, 남성현6, 강동진7, 강명희8*

JIHOON JUNG1, FREDRICH SIMANUNGKALIT1, DONGHA KANG1,2, NAIZHENG YAN3, JOOHYANG KIM4, SOMANG SONG4, YESEUL KIM5, SUNGHYUN NAM6, DONG-JIN KANG7, MYOUNGHEE KANG8*

1경상국립대학교 대학원 해양경찰시스템학과 대학원생
2국립수산과학원 수산공학과 연구원
3북해도대학교 수산과학부 교수
4서울대학교 대학원 지구환경과학부 대학원생
5한국해양과학기술원 첨단인프라운영센터 선임기술원
6서울대학교 지구환경과학부/해양연구소 교수
7한국해양과학기술원 부원장 / 과학기술연합대학원대학교 해양과학전공 교수
8경상국립대학교 해양경찰시스템학과/해양산업연구소 교수
1Student, Department of Maritime Police and Production System, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong 53064, Korea
2Researcher, Fisheries Engineering Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan 46083, Korea
3Professor, School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate 041-8611, Japan
4Student, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
5Senior Researcher Specialist, Advanced Infrastructure Operations Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan 49111, Korea
6Professor, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences/Research Institute of Oceanography, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
7Vice President, Office of the Vice President, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan 49111, Korea / Professor, Department of Ocean Science, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, Korea
8Professor, Department of Maritime Police and Production System/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong 53064, Korea
31 May 2026. pp. 31-46
PDF Citation
Abstract
Using acoustic data collected in the western Indian Ocean, tropical tuna catch data from the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, and Copernicus-based oceanographic data, this study investigated the relationships among the catch distributions of bigeye tuna, skipjack tuna, and yellowfin tuna, the distribution of prey organisms, and oceanographic conditions. The Nautical Area Scattering Coefficient (NASC) was calculated using 38 kHz acoustic data obtained from the R/V Isabu of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology in December 2021, and was compared with tropical tuna catches and temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen data. The results showed that NASC was relatively high in the 9°-12°S and 3°-6°S areas, whereas tropical tuna catches tended to be concentrated in the northwestern and equatorial regions. Although all three tropical tuna species showed high catches in the northern and equatorial regions, their spatial distributions differed among species. Skipjack tuna and yellowfin tuna were mainly concentrated north of 3°S, whereas bigeye tuna was also partially caught south of 9°S. The Spearman correlation coefficient between NASC and tropical tuna catches was very low and not statistically significant (ρ = 0.029, p = 0.172). This was considered to be attributable to the spatiotemporal mismatch between the acoustic and catch data, as well as the limitations of the sample-based catch data. The oceanographic analysis showed that the northern and equatorial regions, where tuna catches were concentrated, partially overlapped with areas characterized by relatively high temperature and dissolved oxygen concentrations at a depth of 34 m. These conditions showed some similarity to the preferred environmental ranges of tropical tunas reported in previous studies. In addition, some significant correlations were observed between NASC and oceanographic variables; however, the absolute values of the correlation coefficients were generally low, indicating weak relationships. This study provides a preliminary integrated comparison of acoustic data, tropical tuna catch data, and oceanographic data in the western Indian Ocean, and its findings are expected to serve as baseline information for future investigations of ecological linkages among tuna resources, prey organisms, and oceanographic conditions.
Keywords
Tropical tunas
Indian Ocean
Echosounder
Prey organisms
Oceanographic conditions
서부 인도양에서 수집된 음향자료와 인도양 다랑어 위원회 열대 다랑어 어획자료 및 Copernicus 기반 해양환경 자료를 활용하여 눈다랑어, 가다랑어, 황다랑어의 어획 분포와 먹이생물 분포 및 해양환경 간의 관계를 조사하였다. 2021년 12월 한국해양과학기술원 연구선 이사부호에서 획득한 38 kHz 음향자료를 이용하여 해리면적산란계수(NASC)를 산출하였으며, 이를 열대 다랑어 어획량 및 수온, 염분, 용존산소 자료와 비교하였다. 분석 결과, NASC는 남위 9°-12° 및 남위 3°-6° 해역에서 상대적으로 높게 나타난 반면, 열대 다랑어 어획량은 북서부 및 적도 인근 해역에 집중되는 경향을 보였다. 열대 다랑어 3종 모두 북부 및 적도 인근 해역에서 높은 어획량을 나타냈으나, 종별 공간 분포에는 차이가 있었다. 가다랑어와 황다랑어는 주로 남위 3° 이북 해역에 집중되었고, 눈다랑어는 남위 9° 이남에서도 일부 어획이 나타났다. NASC와 열대 다랑어 어획량 간 스피어만 상관계수는 매우 낮았으며 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다(ρ = 0.029, p = 0.172). 이는 음향자료와 어획자료 간의 시·공간적 불일치와 표본 기반 어획자료의 한계에 기인한 것으로 판단된다. 해양환경 분석에서는 다랑어 어획이 집중된 북부 및 적도 인근 해역이 34 m 수심에서 비교적 높은 수온과 용존산소 농도가 나타난 구간과 일부 중첩되었으며, 이는 기존 연구에서 제시된 열대 다랑어의 선호 환경 범위와 일부 유사한 경향을 보였다. 또한 NASC와 해양환경 변수 간에는 일부 유의한 상관관계가 나타났으나, 전반적으로 상관계수의 절대값이 낮아 약한 수준의 관계를 보였다. 본 연구는 서부 인도양에서 음향자료와 열대 다랑어 어획자료 및 해양환경 자료를 통합적으로 비교·분석한 기초 연구로서, 향후 다랑어 자원과 먹이생물 및 해양환경 간의 생태적 연계성을 규명하기 위한 기반 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.
References
  1. Bassett, C., A. De Robertis and C.D. Wilson, 2018. Broadband echosounder measurements of the frequency response of fishes and euphausiids in the Gulf of Alaska. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 75(3): 1131-1142. DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx204.
  2. Bertrand, A. and E. Josse, 2000. Tuna target-strength related to fish length and swimbladder volume. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 57: 1143-1146. DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0881.
  3. Boyra, G., G. Moreno, B. Sobradillo, I. Pérez-Arjona, I. Sancristobal and D.A. Demer, 2018. Target strength of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) associated with fish aggregating devices (FADs). ICES J. Mar. Sci., 75(5): 1790-1802. DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsy041.
  4. Brill, R.W., K.A. Bigelow, M.K. Musyl, K.A. Fritsches and E.J. Warrant, 2005. Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) behavior and physiology and their relevance to stock assessments and fishery biology. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 57(2): 142-161.
  5. CMEMS (Copernicus Marine Service Information, Marine Data Store), 2025a. Global Ocean Physics Analysis and Forecast (GLOBAL_ANALYSISFORECAST_PHY_001_024). EU. Copernicus Marine Service Information, Marine Data Store. Available at: https://data.marine.copernicus.eu/product/GLOBAL_ANALYSISFORECAST_PHY_001_024/description (Accessed 10 Jan 2026).
  6. CMEMS (Copernicus Marine Service Information, Marine Data Store), 2025b. Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Analysis and Forecast (GLOBAL_ANALYSISFORECAST_BGC_001_028). EU. Copernicus Marine Service Information, Marine Data Store. Available at: https://data.marine.copernicus.eu/product/GLOBAL_ANALYSISFORECAST_BGC_001_028/description (Accessed 10 Jan 2026).
  7. Druon, J.N., E. Chassot, L. Floch and A. Maufroy, 2015. Preferred habitat of tropical tuna species in the Eastern Atlantic and Western Indian Oceans: a comparative analysis between FAD-associated and free-swimming schools. IOTC-2015-WPTT17-31, 17th Working Party on Tropical Tunas (WPTT), Meeting document.
  8. Echoview, 2025. Help file for Echoview. Available at: https://support.echoview.com/WebHelp/Echoview.htm (Accessed 17 Jul 2025).
  9. Esri, 2025. How Buffer (Analysis) works. ArcMap | Documentation ArcGIS Desktop. Available at: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/analysis-toolbox/how-buffer-analysis-works.htm (Accessed 15 Jul 2025).
  10. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2025. Thunnus obesus (Lowe, 1839). In: Fisheries and Aquaculture. Available at: https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/aqspecies/alpha3code/bet (Accessed 10 Aug 2025).
  11. Hwang, K.S., J.H. Lee, J.H. Park, H.K. Cha, J.H. Choi, H.B. Lee, J.S. Park and M.H. Kang, 2016. First trial of the state-of-the-art acoustic systems mounted on the R/V Tamgu 21. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49(4): 509-515. DOI: 10.5657/KFAS.2016.0509.
  12. IOTC (Indian Ocean Tuna Commission), 2014. Guidelines for the reporting of fisheries statistics to the IOTC. IOTC Secretariat, Mahé, Seychelles, 70 pp.
  13. IOTC (Indian Ocean Tuna Commission), 2022a. Executive summary: Bigeye tuna (2022). In: Report of the 25th Session of the IOTC Scientific Committee, IOTC-2022-SC25-R[E], Appendix 9.
  14. IOTC (Indian Ocean Tuna Commission), 2022b. Executive summary: Skipjack tuna (2022). In: Report of the 25th Session of the IOTC Scientific Committee, IOTC-2022-SC25-R[E], Appendix 10.
  15. IOTC (Indian Ocean Tuna Commission), 2022c. Executive summary: Yellowfin tuna (2022). In: Report of the 25th Session of the IOTC Scientific Committee, IOTC-2022-SC25-R[E], Appendix 11.
  16. Kaartvedt, S., A. Røstad, T.A. Klevjer and A. Staby, 2009. Use of bottom-mounted echo sounders in exploring behavior of mesopelagic fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 395: 109-118. DOI: 10.3354/meps08174.
  17. Kailola, P.J., M.J. Williams, P.C. Stewart, R.E. Reichelt, A. McNee and C. Grieve, 1993. Australian fisheries resources. Bureau of Resource Sciences and the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, 422 pp.
  18. Kang, D.H., J.H. Jung, F. Simanungkalit, J.H. Kim, S.M. Song, Y.S. Kim, S.H. Nam, D.J. Kang and M.H. Kang, 2025. Relationship between tropical tuna catches and acoustic biomass of prey organisms in the southwestern Indian Ocean. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol., 61: 126-138. DOI: 10.3796/KSFOT.2025.61.2.126.
  19. Kang, M., K.-D. Park, E. Min, C. Lee, T. Kang, T. Oh, B. Lim, D. Hwang and B.-Y. Kim, 2022. A pilot study on the application of environmental DNA to the estimation of the biomass of dominant species in the northwestern waters of Jeju Island. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol., 58(1): 39-48. DOI: 10.3796/KSFOT.2022.58.1.039.
  20. Kang, M., S. Honda and T. Oshima, 2006. Age characteristics of walleye pollock school echoes. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 63(8): 1465-1476. DOI: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.06.007.
  21. Kang, M.H., F. Simanungkalit, D.H. Kang, J.H. Jung, J.Y. Kim, S.M. Song, Y.S. Kim, D.-J. Kang and S.H. Nam, 2024. Latitudinal influences on sound scattering layer characteristics in the Southwestern Indian Ocean: insights into oceanographic environmental interactions. Front. Mar. Sci., 11: 1481531. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1481531.
  22. Kang, M.H., H. Kim, J.H. Kang, J.H. Jung, D.H. Kang, F. Simanungkalit, S.M. Song, J.Y. Kim, Y.S. Kim, S.H. Nam and D.J. Kang, 2026. First integrated analysis of acoustic, biological, and environmental factors influencing tropical tuna in the western Indian Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci., 13: 1714658. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2026.1714658.
  23. Kang, M.H., Y.I. Seo, T.Y. Oh, K.H. Lee and C.S. Jang, 2015. Estimating the biomass of anchovy species off the coast of Tongyeong and Yeosu in South Korea in the spring and winter of 2013 and 2014. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol., 51(1): 86-93. DOI: 10.3796/KSFT.2015.51.1.086.
  24. Keesing, J. and T. Irvine, 2005. Coastal biodiversity in the Indian Ocean: The known, the unknown and the unknowable. Indian J. Mar. Sci., 34(1): 11-26.
  25. Kumar, P.S., G.N. Pillai and U. Manjusha, 2014. El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) impact on tuna fisheries in Indian Ocean. SpringerPlus, 3: 591. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-591.
  26. Lan, K.W., K. Evans and M.A. Lee, 2013. Effects of climate variability on the distribution and fishing conditions of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the western Indian Ocean. Climatic Change, 119: 63-77. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0637-8.
  27. Lee, S.I., D.N. Kim and K.H. Lee, 2020. Characteristics on bycatch in Korean tuna purse seine fishery associated with FAD in the Indian Ocean by scientific observer programs. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol., 56(4): 277-291. DOI: 10.3796/KSFOT.2020.56.4.277.
  28. MBRIS (Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea), 2025. Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) species information. Marine Bio-Resource Information Service, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea. Available at: https://www.mbris.kr/pub/marine/tsearch/tsearchDetail.do?spcTxnId=270000008957 (Accessed 10 Aug 2025).
  29. Miyake, M.P., P. Guillotreau, C.-H. Sun and G. Ishimura, 2010. Recent developments in the tuna industry: Stocks, fisheries, management, processing, trade and markets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, No. 543. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, 125 pp.
  30. Moreno, G., G. Boyra, I. Sancristobal, D. Itano and V. Restrepo, 2019. Towards acoustic discrimination of tropical tuna associated with Fish Aggregating Devices. PLOS ONE, 14(6): e0216353. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216353.
  31. NIC (National Intelligence Council), 2013. The future of Indian Ocean and South China Sea fisheries: Implications for the United States. NICR 2013-38. Available at: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/nic/NICR%202013-38%20Fisheries%20Report%20FINAL.pdf (Accessed 15 Aug 2025).
  32. Obura, D.O., 2017. Reviving the Western Indian Ocean economy: Actions for a sustainable future. WWF - World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland, 64 pp.
  33. Park, J.S., Y.I. Seo, C.S. Jang, B.S. Park, S.S. Park, Y.S. An, J.S. Park and M.H. Kang, 2016. Frequency responses of anchovy schools in the South Sea of South Korea in spring and winter. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol., 52(2): 111-120. DOI: 10.3796/KSFT.2016.52.2.111.
  34. Pillai, G.N. and P. Satheeshkumar, 2012. Biology, fishery, conservation and management of Indian Ocean tuna fisheries. Ocean Sci. J., 47(4): 411-433. DOI: 10.1007/s12601-012-0038-y.
  35. Roger, C., 1994. Relationships among yellowfin and skipjack tuna, their prey-fish and plankton in the tropical western Indian Ocean. Fish. Oceanogr., 3(2): 133-141.
  36. Sobradillo, B., G. Boyra, J. Uranga and G. Moreno, 2024. Target strength measurements of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and acoustic discrimination of three tropical tuna species. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 81(5): 850-863. DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsae040.
  37. Song, L.M., Y. Zhang, L.X. Xu, W.X. Jiang and J.Q. Wang, 2008. Environmental preferences of longlining for yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the tropical high seas of the Indian Ocean. Fish. Oceanogr., 17(4): 239-253. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00476.x.
  38. Sun, M., Y. Cai, K. Zhang, X. Zhao and Z. Chen, 2020. A method to analyze the sensitivity ranking of various abiotic factors to acoustic densities of fishery resources in the surface mixed layer and bottom cold water layer of the coastal area of low latitude: A case study in the northern South China Sea. Sci. Rep., 10: 11128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67387-7.
  39. Yang, Y.S., K.H. Lee, B.K. Hwang, H.B. Lee, I.O. Kim and S.H. Kim, 2014. Backscattering strength and vertical distribution of dominant fishes in inland waters by hydroacoustics. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol., 50(4): 476-486. DOI: 10.3796/KSFT.2014.50.4.476.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Oceanography
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국해양학회
  • Journal Title :The Sea Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국해양학회지 바다
  • Volume : 31
  • No :2
  • Pages :31-46
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7850/jkso.2026.31.2.031
Journal Informaiton The Sea Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography The Sea Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close